- Resources
- Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT)
Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT)
Engineered wood that competes with concrete and steel at scale
Contents
What is CLT?
Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is an engineered wood product made from layers of solid timber boards glued together at right angles to one another, typically in three, five, or seven layers. This cross-lamination gives the panels structural strength and stiffness in both directions, creating a material that can be used for walls, floors, and roofs in buildings up to 10 storeys or more.
Developed in Austria in the early 1990s, CLT has transformed how architects and engineers think about timber in construction. It is not a niche eco-material - it is a legitimate structural alternative to concrete and steel for a growing range of building types, from housing to offices, schools, and mixed-use developments.
Major manufacturers include Stora Enso, KLH, Binderholz, and Mayr-Melnhof. UK-based manufacturing is emerging, with facilities from companies like Innovaré reducing the transport footprint for domestic projects.
How is it manufactured?
CLT production begins with kiln-dried softwood boards - typically spruce, pine, or larch - sourced from sustainably managed forests. The boards are graded for structural quality, planed, and then arranged in alternating layers perpendicular to each other.
The layers are bonded using structural adhesive (most commonly polyurethane-based, though some manufacturers offer formaldehyde-free options) and pressed under hydraulic pressure. The resulting panels can be manufactured up to 16 metres long, 3.5 metres wide, and 500mm thick.
Panels are then precision-cut using CNC machines to create openings for windows, doors, services, and connections. This off-site fabrication means CLT arrives on site ready to assemble, significantly reducing construction time and on-site waste.
From board to building
- 1
Kiln-dried boards
Spruce, pine, or larch from managed forests
- 2
Grade and plane
Boards checked and graded for structural quality
- 3
Cross-laminate
Layers arranged at right angles to each other
- 4
Bond and press
Structural adhesive cured under hydraulic pressure
- 5
CNC cutting
Openings cut for windows, doors, and services
- 6
Assemble on site
Panels arrive ready, cutting build time and waste
By the numbers. A CLT building can be erected 30-50% faster than an equivalent concrete frame, with up to 90% less on-site waste. The Dalston Works housing scheme in London - 10 storeys of CLT - was erected at a rate of one storey per week.
Structural capabilities
CLT has a strength-to-weight ratio that makes it competitive with concrete for many building types. A CLT panel weighs approximately one-fifth of an equivalent reinforced concrete slab, which can reduce foundation requirements and enable construction on sites with poor ground conditions.
| Topic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Compressive strength | 20-30 MPa perpendicular to the panel face |
| Bending strength | varies by layup, but five-layer panels typically achieve 20-24 MPa in the major direction |
| Building height | proven up to 10+ storeys (Mjøstårnet in Norway reaches 18 storeys at 85.4m) |
| Span capability | floor spans of 5-8m are typical; longer spans require post-tensioning or hybrid solutions with glulam beams |
| Seismic performance | CLT performs well in earthquake zones due to its ductile connections and light weight |
Carbon performance
CLT offers a significant embodied carbon advantage over concrete and steel framing. The timber stores carbon absorbed during tree growth, while the manufacturing process is relatively low-energy compared to cement production or steelmaking.
A typical CLT panel stores approximately 700-900 kg CO2 per cubic metre of timber. When this biogenic carbon storage is accounted for (module A1 in EPD methodology), CLT structures can achieve dramatically lower - sometimes negative - embodied carbon figures compared to concrete or steel alternatives.
Lowest carbon
Typically 100-200 kg CO2e/m² (A1-A5) - and can go negative when biogenic carbon storage is counted.
Mid-range
An equivalent steel frame typically comes in at 250-400 kg CO2e/m².
Highest of the three
An equivalent reinforced concrete frame typically comes in at 300-500 kg CO2e/m².
Watch out. Biogenic carbon accounting is still debated. Some carbon assessment frameworks (like RICS) include biogenic carbon storage; others do not. Always clarify which methodology is being used when comparing CLT to other structural options.
Fire performance
Fire safety is the most frequently raised concern about CLT buildings, but the evidence is well-established. CLT chars at a predictable rate (approximately 0.65mm per minute) and the charred layer acts as insulation, protecting the unburnt timber behind it. Structural engineers design for this by specifying additional sacrificial timber thickness.
CLT buildings routinely achieve 60, 90, and 120-minute fire resistance ratings when properly designed. Full-scale fire tests - including those by the BRE and various European research institutes - have demonstrated that CLT structures can meet the fire safety requirements of tall buildings.
| Topic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Charring rate | ~0.65mm/min (Eurocode 5), predictable and designable |
| Fire resistance | 60-120 minutes achievable through panel thickness design |
| Encapsulation | CLT can be fully encapsulated behind fire-rated plasterboard for enhanced protection |
| Post-fire strength | uncharred timber retains full structural capacity |
| UK regulatory position | CLT is permitted under Building Regulations where fire engineering demonstrates compliance |
Note. Following the Grenfell tragedy, the UK government introduced a ban on combustible materials in external walls of buildings over 18m. This does not ban CLT as a structural material but affects how external wall build-ups are detailed in taller CLT buildings.
Trade-offs to consider
CLT is not the right choice for every project. These are the genuine constraints to evaluate during design.
| Topic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Cost | CLT frames can be 5-15% more expensive than concrete for typical multi-storey buildings, though programme savings often offset this |
| Acoustic performance | flanking sound transmission requires careful detailing - resilient layers, acoustic breaks, and mass are typically needed |
| Moisture protection | CLT must be kept dry during construction and in service - weather protection strategy is critical |
| Services coordination | routing services through CLT panels requires early planning; cutting on site should be minimised |
| Supply chain | most CLT is still imported from Austria, Germany, or Scandinavia, adding transport carbon and lead time |
| Insurance | some insurers are still developing their understanding of CLT buildings, which can affect premiums |
| Floor depth | CLT floors are typically deeper than RC flat slabs for equivalent spans, affecting floor-to-floor heights |



